Followers

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Barrel Train incident kills 1 seroiusly injures others


The incident below is an example of how loosely regulated amusement rides are throughout the United States. Chances are this homemade device has no engineering data, manufacturing standards, or even insurance. I have experience in several of these. People think they are going to get wealthy quick scheme. What makes this one so sad is a child is dead.

By the way, four wheelers are not commercial vehicle or should be used to pull human cargo.

http://www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S=13495401

"News9.com

MARIETTA, Oklahoma – One child is dead and four children were seriously injured in an accident involving a four-wheeler ride at the Love County Fairgrounds.

Love County Undersheriff Jason Bone said a four-wheeler was pulling 55 gallon barrels that were hollowed out so kids could sit in them for a make-shift train ride. Seven of those drums were being pulled by the ATV when they overturned.

Three children were airlifted to an area hospital. Two other children were taken to the hospital in Marietta where 8-year-old Jaylen Wolf was pronounced dead. The other child remained hospitalized.

Bone said the children range in age from three to eight years old.

The driver of the four-wheeler was not injured.

The accident happened around 5:45 p.m. at the Big 5 Headstart benefit spaghetti supper, at the Love County fair building.

The Love's County Sheriff's Department and the Oklahoma Highway Patrol are investigating the incident."


***The picture above is not the barrel train that the story refers to. It is a photo of another very similar barrel train.**





http://www.krmgoup.com

Friday, July 16, 2010

West Virginia Amusement Ride Inspections

Effective immediately I am now performing official state inspections in West Virginia. West Virginia at this time requires an annual inspection of all amusement rides, devices and attractions.

Inspections can be arranged in advance by contacting Ken Martin at 804-342-1808. I will continue to do inspections in Missouri, Texas and Virginia as well as consulting and expert services.





http://www.krmgoup.com

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Duck Boat incident on the Delaware River

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100707/ap_on_re_us/us_philly_duck_boat_accident

As a Safety Consultant and Expert Witness I have handled a few premises liability cases involving Duck Boats. A Duck Boat is a combination of motor vehicle, bus, taxi, boat, amusement device and entertainment venue.

The crews that staff them for the most part are seasonal workers under 25 and should be mentioned very little training.

I think it is time for the individual states and cities to pursue stricter permitting and licensing and inspection of the devices. An incident such as the one today on the Delaware River should have never occurred, much less should there have been loss of life.


http://www.krmgoup.com

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

A third incident involving a child

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/fl-miami-dade-fair-boy-hurt-20100330,0,4787526.story

It is reported that the child was not secure in the ride located at the Miami-Dade Fair.




http://www.krmgoup.com

Monday, March 29, 2010

A new incident involving a child and an amusement ride

http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=12223096

Warning graphic pictures of the injured child.

This latest incident involves a Zamperla Tea Cup ride also know as a mini Tea Cup. It can be considered a family ride and is designed for multiple riders. The mini Tea Cup had a mandatory Safety Bulletin last year regarding the installation of seat belts.

The seat belts to be installed were not what we think of when we think of seat belts. It is more of a one size fits all seat belt, or in this case one size fits riders on one side of the tub/car and an exact same belt is on the other side. Of course the best type of seat belt is where each rider has their own. To do that it would perhaps restrict the capacity of this particular amusement ride.

The base of the Tea Cup rides spins at about 7 rpm's. Then within that base there are separate platforms that contain the actual tub/car that spins about twice speed of the larger platform. The individual tub/car has its own axle and brake and it could be possible for the individual tub/car to spin as fast as someone could humanly spin the tub/car.

The spinning sensation can and does create forces/pressure on the body that are called "G" forces. Normally a ride is designed and manufactured to limit these amount of forces. These forces can be negative or positive. Due to the dual spinning nature of this ride and the reported extra spinning by an unknown individual it is very foreseeable that negative forces existed and it was those forces that forced the child out of his seat. Had one seat belt per passenger been in use it is very likely the child would not have come out of the ride, however he still could have had a injury.

"G" forces sometime are hard to understand. Say you have a 50 pound rider and the negative "G" forces are -2.5 then there would be about 125 pounds of force against the rider, forcing them out of the tub/car. Even if a 50 pound individual was strong for there size, I do not think that they could hold on for very long.

My information is based on my knowledge, education and experience. It also tells me that when children and amusement rides are involved nothing is ever simple.



http://www.krmgoup.com

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Inflatable Safety is in the news again

http://www.kansas.com/2010/03/28/1244792/inflatables-owner-says-misuse.html


http://www.kansas.com/2010/03/28/1244818/rules-for-inflatables-safety-seen.html

Plain and simple the owner of this Kansas inflatable center was not following the industry standards, Consumer Product Safety Commission requirements or standard common sense. On top of that he allowed his own son to inspect and certify his inflatables. Why because the city allowed that.

Then comes a fellow safety consultant who suggest the extreme when it comes to inspection. As of my last information the testing and certification he speaks of does not have any questions regarding inflatables.

Here is what needs to be done.

1. Write a comprehensive law similar to Pennslyvania's or New Jersey's for Inflatables.

2. Train the owner and operators.

3. Staff each and every inflatable with a training operator. Two for the larger ones.

4. Educate the patron and let them know that they are responsible for following the rules and listening to the operator of the inflatable.








http://www.krmgoup.com

Friday, March 05, 2010

LESSONS LEARNED THE HARD WAY
(Is This in Store for Richmond, VA)
March 5, 2010

As a safety consultant and premises’ liability expert I am often called upon to evaluate or opine on incidents where people and/or property are injured and/or damaged as a result of other people’s inadequate care or negligence. Or in other words, I find out what went wrong. In doing so, I travel down many paths and gather lots of information and evidence regarding the what, when, how and where an incident occurs.

Recently I had an opportunity to attend a training seminar conducted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Amusement Ride Safety bureau, held in Grantville, Pennsylvania. The seminar covered every aspect of amusement ride safety, which is heavily premises’ liability related. This year a track was added on Haunted Attractions. It included night clubs, dance halls, auditorium, arenas and just about every type of public assembly place imaginable.

The keynote speaker was Dave Kane. Unless you are from Rhode Island most likely most likely you might not know him. He is the father of the youngest person killed in the Station Night Club a few years ago. In this particular fire 100 people were killed and over 200 were injured as the result of negligence on the part of many people.

The facts of this case were a night club run by two brother that had been decorated with flammable material where live music with pyrotechnics were used. The original certificate of occupancy was for much less than the over 400 people in the building that night. Make no mistake; the brothers who owned and operated this night club are ultimately responsible for the man made disaster. As a result of the massive and multi-jurisdictional investigation it revealed failure on not only the owners, but also the Building Official, Fire Marshall, other city Officials and the band. The band member who pushed the button for the fireworks stepped up and took responsibility for his actions. He served a few months in jail. No one else served any time. Civil lawsuits and their settlements are pending.

Let’s apply this to the situation right her in Richmond, Virginia. We have people promoting teen parties at various locations across the city in buildings that are not approved for that type of use. In fact we don’t even have a current night club ordinance on the books to enforce any laws that we may or may not have regulating these situations. The police say they are short staffed, over worked and not well versed in the social networks where these events are promoted.

We add to this fact that teenagers are being brought into the city from all over the metro area. Others are being dropped off by their parents while others are telling their parents they are out with friends or at the movies. Add some alcohol, motor vehicles, attitudes, guns and you get an unbelievable formula for disaster, all man made.

For the most part the Richmond Police top brass are being tight lipped. Just like they were a few years ago when my neighbor was murdered in broad daylight on West Broad Street near the DMV. Many times I have asked why do you keep the information to yourself. Times they are a changing. Electronic notification via email and messaging service is the latest in many cities. The more eyes and ears we have listening and looking for things the more responsive we can be to dangerous situations such as these teenage parties. Hey the teens are using it, why not the people trying to prevent tragedy?

Just like in the Rhode Island Station Night Club incident we can ultimately indentify the responsible party, which are the parents and they should be held responsible. However the rest of us have a moral obligation to participate in preventing these catastrophic events.







http://www.krmgoup.com